To
the Moon in Nine Hours
Twenty years after the Challenger explosion, NASA's
biggest risks of human life are being found, surprisingly, in
unmanned missions.
by Scott
Ritcher, from News The Magazine
The
fastest spacecraft in history, NASA's New Horizons probe, was launched
at 2:00 pm Eastern time on Thursday and is now enroute to Pluto.
The 3-billion-mile trip will take ten years, but not for a lack
of speed, power, or controversy.
Shortly
after its lift off aboard an Atlas V rocket, New Horizons separated
from its launch vehicle and was already setting speed records. In
about the same amount of time it takes someone to drive from Chicago
to Memphis, nine hours, the unmanned spacecraft had passed the moon
- a trip that took Apollo 11's astronaunts three days to make in
1969.
In
just a year, the probe will reach Jupiter, a distance of about 365
million miles (or 641 years by car), and will pick up speed by using
the huge planet's gravity as a slingshot. Busting out of Jupiter's
gravitational pull, New Horizons will hit a velocity of 13 miles
per second, or about 47,000 miles per hour. And even though that's
fast enough to make the Chicago-to-Memphis trip in 40 seconds, the
remainder of its journey to Pluto will take nine years.
NEVER-BEFORE-SEEN
FOOTAGE
The
mission will investigate the Kuiper Belt, an area of ice and rocks
that fill the solar system past Neptune. The Kupier Belt was known
only in theory for decades. Scientists suspected there must be an
area somewhere that contains random debris left over from the creation
of the solar system. However, the first objects proving the physical
existence of the this 4.6-billion-year-old wreckage were discovered
in 1992 and have - obviously - never been seen up close.
CNN
reported that Alan Stern, the project's principal investigator,
said New Horizons is "the capstone of the initial reconnaissance
of the planets." He alluded to the long-held belief at NASA
that the agency's work is an important part of the United States'
national legacy. "It's something that will go down in history,
not just for the way it changes textbooks, but for the sort of society
we are, that we do these things of lasting historic importance,
that we explore beyond our own world."
A RISKY,
UNMANNED MISSION
An
unsavory part of NASA's legacy, however, is that of several high-profile
accidents that have cost the lives of about 4% of all those who
have ever attempted to journey into space. Notably, the space shuttle
Challenger which exploded shortly after launch January 28, 1986,
twenty years ago this month, and the shuttle Columbia which disintegrated
during re-entry, 16 minutes before landing on February 1, 2003,
have scarred the agency's safety record.
The
New Horizons launch was particularly controversial, not just because
of these relatively recent accidents, but primarily because the
spacecraft is carrying 24 pounds of radioactive Plutonium-238. The
craft will use the radioactive material for power later in the odyssey
as it travels into areas where the sun's light is so faint that
it can no longer be harnessed for energy. And although the energy
it will produce is only about what it would take to illuminate two
100-watt light bulbs, it must do so for ten years.
THE
RISK OF A HIROSHIMA IN FLORIDA
New
Horizon's plutonium dioxide is encased in 18 graphite compartments
inside the spacecraft's radioisotope thermoelectric generator. The
generator is an aluminum cylinder weighing 123 pounds, roughly the
size of three milk crates. Twenty-five other NASA missions have
used similar generators, including six trips during the Apollo program.
For
this launch, due to nuclear regulatory restrictions, the mission
ultimately required the approval of the White House before it could
go forward. NASA was ordered to prepare a comprehensive risk study
for the government. The agency concluded that the launch posed a
1 in 620 chance of accidentally releasing deadly, radioactive plutonium
into the air.
Another
report from NASA and the Department of Energy put the chances at
1 in 350.
Some environmental opponents of using this radioactive power source
compare a possible launch accident to the effect of a small nuclear
bomb going off on central Florida's Atlantic coast.
In
their environmental impact statement, NASA estimated that in the
event of such an accident, the maximum mean dose of radiation sustained
by anyone within 62 miles of Cape Canaveral would be equivalent
to 15 months of the natural amount the average US resident already
receives. Beyond the sickness and loss of life, the financial cost
of decontaminating the area could be as much as $1.3 billion per
square mile. While the zone directly adjacent to the launch site
is sparsely populated, the 62-mile radius an accidenty would affect
includes the Walt Disney World and Epcot resort parks, and most
of the 1.5 million residents of Orlando.
In
preparation for the launch, NASA sent out sixteen mobile teams to
measure radiation levels and trained the staffs of local hospitals
in helping patients suffering from radioactive exposure.
Luckily,
for everyone involved and those nearby, the launch went off flawlessly.
Now we can all just relax and wait for New Horizons to send home
some amazing pictures from its trip. It should prove to be quite
a ride. |